A Biological and Physical Monitoring Program to Evaluate Long-term Impacts from Sand Dredging Operations in the United States Outer Continental Shelf

2004 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 126-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Nairn ◽  
Jay A. Johnson ◽  
Dane Hardin ◽  
Jacqueline Michel
2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F Powers

The capacity of a forest site to capture carbon and convert it into biomass defines fundamental site productivity. In the United States, the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) of 1976 mandates that this capacity must be protected on federally managed lands. Responding to NFMA, the USDA Forest Service began a soil-based monitoring program for its managed forests. Lacking an extensive research base, soil-based standards were predicated largely on professional judgment. To provide a stronger foundation, a national program of Long-Term Soil Productivity (LTSP) research was established. The LTSP program addresses both short- and long-term consequences of site and soil disturbance on fundamental forest productivity. Research centers on two key properties affecting a site's long-term productive capacity, site organic matter and soil porosity, each of which is readily influenced by management. A coordinated research network of more than 100 field installations in the United States and Canada is examining how pulse changes in these properties affect soil processes supporting vegetative growth and potential productivity. Results from installations with ≥5 years of response were presented on the 10th anniversary of LTSP, and the latest findings are assembled here. This paper describes the evolution of the study and the characteristics of the oldest field installations.


1981 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan I. Charney

In 1976 the United States Congress established the Coastal Energy Impact Program (CEIP) for the purpose of giving financial assistance to those coastal states of the United States off whose shores resource development was being conducted on the outer continental shelf. The program was designed to alleviate the burden that offshore development was said to have placed on those coastal states. The enacting legislation stipulated that the states must comply with certain requirements of the Act in exchange for the distribution of federal funds. Although these funds were to be provided partly in the form of grants distributed on the basis of various statutory formulas, the largest amount of the grants was to be divided on the basis of adjacency. Thus, a coastal state would receive additional funds if the activity on the outer continental shelf took place in the area determined to be “adjacent” to that state. As a result, the geographical description of the areas “adjacent” to each coastal state had a direct impact on the amount of funds each state would realize from the program. Statutory provisions and the regulations required that adjacency be determined on the basis of lateral boundaries drawn in the ocean seaward from the coastal state. Those boundaries might already have been established on the basis of interstate agreements or court decisions. In the absence of such delimitations, the Assistant Administrator for Coastal Zone Management of the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was called upon to establish the “lateral seaward boundaries” on the basis of the international law applicable to lateral boundary delimitations. The “lateral seaward boundaries” so established by the Assistant Administrator would have no legal significance other than for CEIP purposes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document